Mail #979

Back to main page of archive

Previous mail   Next mail   Unformatted/full headers
Overview  10 days   Subject   Date   Thread   Author  

From: Phil Nelson
Subject: RTS runtime error checks.
Date: 10 Jul 1997, 14:37:21

>Would it be a violation of the standards if we were to have two RTS
>libraries (libgpc.a and libgpc_g.a), where libgpc_g.a is linked if the
>'-g' compiler switch is used, and libgpc.a (no checks) otherwise?

I would prefer to see the checks being standard and adding a flag to
get better performance.  For example, if any -O flag is used, then
use the library without the checks.

Previous mail   Next mail   Unformatted/full headers
Overview  10 days   Subject   Date   Thread   Author  

In reply to

Back to main page of archive

Note: This page contains information that does not originate from the owner of this web site, but from the authors of the mails archived. The owner of this web site is not responsible for the content of such information. Any use of that infomation requires the consent of the respective author.

Where WWW addresses (URLs) in the mails archived are marked as hyperlinks, this is only for the comfort of the reader. The content of the web pages linked to like this does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the owner of this web site or of the authors of the mails archived. The owner of this web site is not responsible for the content of such web pages. Those pages are explicitly not to be considered as part of the content of this page, but merely as references.

This page was created by Crystal 0.999 (Linux 2.4.27/i686).