Mail #8227

Back to main page of archive

Previous mail   Next mail   Unformatted/full headers
Overview  10 days   Subject   Date   Thread   Author  

From: Grant Jacobs
Subject: Promised unit "paper"
Date: 12 Mar 2003, 11:07:11

At 9:18 PM +0100 11/3/03, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
>Adriaan van Os wrote:
>
>  > It is true that Think Pascal for Macintosh introduced "uses
>>  propagation" as a special feature for practical reasons: the
>>  massiveness of the Macintosh Toolbox. In each unit, you typically had
>>  to refer to fourty or more other units.

Can anyone tell me what the differences are between my model and 
Think Pascal? I'm being lazy: I do have an old copy of Think Pascal 
lying around - not sure if it'll run under Classic on OS X... one day 
I check this out...

>Grant spoke of "MW Pascal". Isn't this the same as Apple MPW Pascal?

Nope. CW = MW (MW is the company that makes CW).

Grant

Previous mail   Next mail   Unformatted/full headers
Overview  10 days   Subject   Date   Thread   Author  

In reply to

Back to main page of archive

Note: This page contains information that does not originate from the owner of this web site, but from the authors of the mails archived. The owner of this web site is not responsible for the content of such information. Any use of that infomation requires the consent of the respective author.

Where WWW addresses (URLs) in the mails archived are marked as hyperlinks, this is only for the comfort of the reader. The content of the web pages linked to like this does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the owner of this web site or of the authors of the mails archived. The owner of this web site is not responsible for the content of such web pages. Those pages are explicitly not to be considered as part of the content of this page, but merely as references.

This page was created by Crystal 0.999 (Linux 2.4.27/i686).