Previous mail
Next mail
Unformatted/full headers
Overview 10 days
Subject
Date
Thread
Author
From: levi@localhost.nc3a.nato.int
Subject: Some GPC questions
Date: 10 Sep 2001, 17:26:47
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Francisco Stefano Wechsler wrote: > > > > On 7 Sep 2001, at 1:22, Frank Heckenbach wrote: > > > > > Well, we could, of course, label any arbitrary version GPC 2.1 or > > > something. There are a number of known bugs, but far less than there > > > were in GPC 2.0, so perhaps we should just do that. Any opinions? > > I think it's time to release 2.1 (or whatever). As long as the user is > kept aware of the bugs, I don't see much problem. The current version won't build on IRIX as I pointed out recently - unlike the good-old 2.0. miklos
Previous mail
Next mail
Unformatted/full headers
Overview 10 days
Subject
Date
Thread
Author
| Author | Subject | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Francisco Stefano Wechsler | Some GPC questions | 10 Sep 2001, 12:36:36 |
Note: This page contains information that does not originate from the owner of this web site, but from the authors of the mails archived. The owner of this web site is not responsible for the content of such information. Any use of that infomation requires the consent of the respective author.
Where WWW addresses (URLs) in the mails archived are marked as hyperlinks, this is only for the comfort of the reader. The content of the web pages linked to like this does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the owner of this web site or of the authors of the mails archived. The owner of this web site is not responsible for the content of such web pages. Those pages are explicitly not to be considered as part of the content of this page, but merely as references.
This page was created by Crystal 0.999 (Linux 2.4.27/i686).