Previous mail
Next mail
Unformatted/full headers
Overview 10 days
Subject
Date
Thread
Author
From: Thorsten Glaser
Subject: just plain gpc? (was Re: cgp?)
Date: 31 May 2004, 03:07:22
Dixitur illum ih8mj@fjf.gnu.de scribere... >> gnu make. This is more a Unix philosophy than a C one. ^^^ Note that this produced a hiccup on part of some readers. Please don't assume the world consists only of ILP32, ELF, #include <linux.h> and stuff like that. >output etc.). If we teach "GP" to pass `-lm -lgpc', we could get rid >of the separate gpc executable and call "GP" gpc. But I'm not sure >if everybody would be comfortable with such a change ... Actually, that idea crossed my mind earlier, and it sounds more natural. I was always wondering why you didn't just use the gcc driver, except for maybe some more esoteric features (which can be done by the now-gp thing then). Bye, //Thorsten
Previous mail
Next mail
Unformatted/full headers
Overview 10 days
Subject
Date
Thread
Author
| Author | Subject | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Frank Heckenbach | just plain gpc? (was Re: cgp?) | 31 May 2004, 14:40:00 |
Note: This page contains information that does not originate from the owner of this web site, but from the authors of the mails archived. The owner of this web site is not responsible for the content of such information. Any use of that infomation requires the consent of the respective author.
Where WWW addresses (URLs) in the mails archived are marked as hyperlinks, this is only for the comfort of the reader. The content of the web pages linked to like this does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the owner of this web site or of the authors of the mails archived. The owner of this web site is not responsible for the content of such web pages. Those pages are explicitly not to be considered as part of the content of this page, but merely as references.
This page was created by Crystal 0.999 (Linux 2.4.27/i686).