Mail #8

Back to main page of archive

Previous mail   Next mail   Unformatted/full headers
Overview  10 days   Subject   Date   Thread   Author  

From: Russ Whitaker
Subject: GNU Pascal Coding stuff
Date: 13 Jul 2001, 14:33:34

On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Frank Heckenbach wrote:

> Marco van de Voort wrote:
> 
> > - You discourage the use of (*, because displaying "(" would be difficult on
> > some terminals, but afaik { is also?
> 
> Nope. What we mean is: The (* *) comments (just like (. .) for array
> indexing etc.) were introduced in the language because at that time
> { }, [ ] etc. were difficult on some terminals.
> 
> Today, this isn't an issue anymore, therefore we use the "original"
> (and shorter) forms { } and [ ].

Good idea. However, hope you don't remove support for (* *) because
during developement it's a handy way to comment out a block of code
 - especially if the block contains { }

Russ

Previous mail   Next mail   Unformatted/full headers
Overview  10 days   Subject   Date   Thread   Author  

Replies

In reply to

Back to main page of archive

Note: This page contains information that does not originate from the owner of this web site, but from the authors of the mails archived. The owner of this web site is not responsible for the content of such information. Any use of that infomation requires the consent of the respective author.

Where WWW addresses (URLs) in the mails archived are marked as hyperlinks, this is only for the comfort of the reader. The content of the web pages linked to like this does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the owner of this web site or of the authors of the mails archived. The owner of this web site is not responsible for the content of such web pages. Those pages are explicitly not to be considered as part of the content of this page, but merely as references.

This page was created by Crystal 0.999 (Linux 2.4.27/i686).